Lately, there have been a lot of articles written about millennials. Some have hit pretty close to home for me, seeing that I am a millennial. But I decided to dig a little deeper to see what exactly the future may hold for me when I finally finish my bachelor’s degree at the University of Oregon. I was startled by the price of homes around the Pacific Northwest, my desired region to live in. Sadly, this will cause not only myself, but many other millennials, to rent an apartment. After a while of thinking about the demand shock that this will likely cause, it started to beg the question: Will millennials cause a little deflation in the housing market?
I have been told by several people that a PhD in economics should only be pursued for one of two (if not both) reasons: You will regret it if you don’t or you want to teach at a four-year university. Based on my education and what I’ve seen concerning graduate school, this pretty much seems to be the case. Why, then do so many people believe that an economist needs a master’s degree at the very least? A lot of it has to do with the fact that people don’t really know what they’re talking about.
Last night, Rachel Maddow from MSNBC did an exposé on President Trump’s tax return from 2005. During the election, Mitt Romney claimed that Trump was hiding a bombshell in his tax returns. Thanks to Rachel Maddow, a bombshell was found. Perhaps it wasn’t the bombshell we were all thinking it would be. As Rachel Maddow found out, the problem with political bombshells is that you could wind up blowing yourself up if you play with them.
Recently, I wrote an article about how much is really enough to have in our savings accounts. After thinking about it, I thought to myself, “How much should we have in our checking accounts?” After talking with some people about it, it’s become apparent to me that many people think it should be similar to the minimuim they keep for their savings account.
If you read my last article, you know that your minimum savings should be equal to all of your living expenses plus necessity expenses for each month that it usually takes you to find another job. This is a bit much to require yourself to have in your checking account as well. If you can do it, more power to you. For the rest of us, the idea revolves around purchasing power.
Something that I’ve kept to myself, and between a few close friends, is a personal prediction about Apple: If Apple ever figures out that the US Dollar is more valuable in India than it is in China, it may pull out of China (partially or completely). More importantly, this should be an alarming wakeup call to China. Recently, China has been making some serious demands to Donald Trump. Many liberals have made it clear that they don’t like President-Elect Trump. But this is a time where maybe they should consider something before they start hating on Trump’s attitude towards China.
Now that President Barack Obama is just a couple of weeks away from transferring power to President-elect Donald Trump, news reports are coming out in praise for who will soon be a former president. Recently, I published an article that shows what the employment situation really looks like when we look outside of the confines of the unemployment rate. Let’s apply this concept to the entire tenure of Barack Obama and see exactly how things look comprehensively compared to when he took office.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released a new jobs report on Friday, reporting an addition of 178,000 jobs and a nice, low 4.6 percent unemployment rate. FiveThirtyEight’s Ben Casselman, their chief economics writer, said that Trump and Clinton could both spin this jobs report, but he also wrote that “Millions of Americans abandoned the labor force during the recession and are now returning at a trickle, if that.” But isn’t it a good thing that the unemployment rate is low and jobs were added? Well, yes, but also no.